- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:13:34 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it>
- Cc: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, public-media-annotation@w3.org, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Marco Casassa Mont <marco_casassa-mont@hp.com>
On Aug 16, 2010, at 13:14 , Renato Iannella wrote: >> I am still wondering what the problem is with separating "is this copyrighted and if so by who?" from "what usages are permitted, or not?". > > We are not proposing this - we are doing the opposite - one model to access *all* policy information. I know you are not. You are opposing the current media annotations draft, which does, for good pragmatic reasons. I'm trying to understand why :-(, and "it looks tidier in one model" is one reason, but not very strong, IMHO. Whereas low-impedance matching to what we find in existing practice is a good reason for a clear expression of copyright (see TCOP in ID3, Copyright in EXIF and MP4, and so on), IMHO. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 14:38:22 UTC