- From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 21:36:33 +0200
- To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Felix, I have added the comment into the tracker tool. http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42786/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/2411 Thierry Le 09/08/2010 10:06, Felix Sasaki a écrit : > Hello all, > > with this mail I am forwarding LC comments from Karen Colye > kcoyle@kcoyle.net . She does not want to join the mailing list, but will be > happy to reply to hour resolution. > > Best, > > Felix > > 1. The scope of the ontology should be clarified as being stored digital > resources. It should also be made clear whether these resources MUST be > accessible online, or could be offline. > > 2. You should add PBCORE (http://pbcore.org) to the list. This is a metadata > set for broadcast media, and I believe it interrelates to the BBC metadata. > Original broadcast date is key for these materials, as is the name of the > show or series (which can be different from the name of the episode). > > 3. There doesn't seem to be much for describing the content of the media. > There is only the description field. I suspect that many media organizations > have a more complex view, and will need for synopsis to be separate from > subjects for the purposes of display. Also, for broadcast programs with > multiple segments, they need a say to say, for example: > 0-1 minute Introductions > 1-19 minute: Interview with x > 19-22 minutes: news segment > 22-31 minute: Interview with y > I don't remember if these are already in PBCore. > > 3. You will probably eventually need to include some preservation metadata. > This is especially important for any digital media that have been derived > from physical media. PREMIS is probably overkill.... but you may be able to > pick a few elements from that. > > Hope this is helpful. If not, feel free to ignore! > > kc >
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 19:37:08 UTC