Hello Christian,
Therefore the question is what name is best? Compression, coding, encoding?
The list of mime types is by no means as comprehensive as MPEG's list, which is why I took the position expressed in an earlier mail ;-) you have understood I would eliminate MIME in this context.
By the way, Christian, any need to update http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ebu_AudioCompressionCodeCS.xml and http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/cs/ebu_VideoCompressionCodeCS.xml , which we had discussed in another life?
Of course, mpeg codecs may not be the only compression schemes. If you believe that the classifications schemes maintained by EBU are incomplete, please do not hesitate to let me know.
Regards,
Jean-pierre
From: Christian Timmerer (ITEC) [mailto:christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at]
Sent: mercredi, 28. avril 2010 14:42
To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
Cc: 'Silvia Pfeiffer'; Daniel Park; public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: [call for comments] ma:compression vs. ma:coding vs. ma:encoding
MPEG has defined URI for its codecs and the list is available at http://mpeg.chiariglione.org/working_documents/general/URI.zip. Latest version (approved last week) is attached. Let me know in case something is missing.
Best regards,
-Christian
-----------------------------------------
**************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it
are confidential and intended solely for the
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
If you have received this email in error,
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email
message has been swept by the mailgateway
**************************************************