RE: ACTION-159: review of API document

Hi. Werner.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bailer, Werner [mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:34 PM
> To: 이원석
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ACTION-159: review of API document
> 
> Dear Woksuk,
> 
> Here is a proposal for the terminology section. Actually I think the
> following paragraph should be sufficient for what we are using now:
> 
> 1.3 Terminology
> 
> In this document the terms "Media Resource", "Property", "Mapping" and
> "Property value type" are to be interpreted as defined in Section 2 of
> Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 [http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10].

Great! I applied your proposal.

> This mentions property value types, which should be moved from the
> ontology to the API document as Pierre Antoine suggested. In that case we
> should also move the definition of the term "Property value type".

Agreed.

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> Best regards,
> Werner
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wslee@etri.re.kr]
> > Sent: Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2009 11:58
> > To: Bailer, Werner
> > Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: ACTION-159: review of API document
> >
> > Hi. Werner.
> >
> > > - several property definitions mention resource and explain that it
> > > can be an abstract concept or an instance. It think we should
> > > reference section 2 of the ontology document in the introduction and
> > > drop this explanation from each of the property descriptions
> >
> > Concerning this issue, do you want to add new sub-clause as 1.3
> > Terminology to the introduction section of API doc?
> > I am a little bit confused how to revise the current API doc regarding
> > this issue. :)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Wonsuk.

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 12:11:57 UTC