RE: ACTION-159: review of API document

Hi. Werner.

Thanks. I got it :)

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bailer, Werner [mailto:werner.bailer@joanneum.at]
> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:30 PM
> To: 이원석
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ACTION-159: review of API document
> 
> Hi Wonsuk,
> 
> > > * Section 1 Introduction
> > > - I think one or two sentences could be added to the introdcution
> > stating
> > > that many issues are open and that some of the definitions are
> > provisional.
> >
> > Agreed about additional sentences.
> > But I don't understand about definitions. Could you let me know which
> > definitions are required?
> 
> Definitions of return types, and similar issues that are still under
> discussion
> 
> > > - as mentioned in my earlier comments to the list, it is not clear to
> > me
> > > why some getters only return a single value (e.g. title), especially
> > if
> > > there are qualifiers for subtypes/roles.
> >
> > Right. I agree we have to make clear this issue for each interface.
> > Do you want to make clear return value for some interfaces for FPWD?
> 
> No, I do not think we can reach a final decision for FPWD, thus my
> suggestion above to state that some of these definitions are preliminary.
> 
> Best regards,
> Werner

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 08:03:30 UTC