RE: [mawg] Revised draft of API Doc

Dear editor team, 
You have made a great work. Thanks for brining us forward.


There are many issues to discuss, and here are two: 

1) I noticed that "Genre", "Relation.relationship" and "Contributor.role" are strings.

What was said about this finally? Shall we keep it like that and recommend best practise to use closed vocabulary such as EBU genres and role schemas?

2) Change example for "Identifier" propety in 2.1.1.1
to a media resource ID instead of the URI. Even if it is referring to an instance (and not a conepct) it can be a number or
a resource ID. To avoid confusion with the identifier "Locator" 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: den 8 oktober 2009 04:23
To: Pierre-Antoine
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: RE: [mawg] Revised draft of API Doc

Hi. PA.

Thanks for good comment.
Your comments are applied the current API doc.

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre-Antoine [mailto:pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 4:56 PM
> To: 이원석
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [mawg] Revised draft of API Doc
> 
> 
> I don't really understand why getContributor and getRelation return a 
> single object rather than a list: object[].
> 
> At first I thought object was generic enough to represent a 
> collection, but then I saw that getCopyright returns a list...
> 
>    pa
> 
> Le 06/10/2009 05:55, 이원석 a écrit :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Below is the revised draft of API Doc
> >
> > http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-api-1.0/mediaont-api-

> 1.0.html
> >
> > I applied Chris’s contribution that was to rearrange section 2 and 3 
> > so that they are combined in one section now. And API part described 
> > by Web IDL.
> >
> > In addition I applied Felix’s comments for Introduction and 
> > Reference
> part.
> >
> > Any comment is more than welcome. J
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wonsuk.
> >

Received on Sunday, 11 October 2009 18:48:43 UTC