Re: [mawg] UC&Req document way forward and comments from Raphael

+1

  pa

Le 24/11/2009 15:24, Soohong Daniel Park a écrit :
> After call, I had a small talk with Raphael in IRC.
> 
> I think it’s very reasonable way for the UC&Req document publication.
> 
> ===========================
> 
> TOPIC: LC for the UC&Req document
> 
> His comments:
> 
> UC&Req is a technical note. In this case, we can safely publish the
> final version when the other documents will be RFC, so no rush for this
> document. I suggest you publish a new WD. It’s useless for this document
> to be a note now since there is a risk it is outdated when the RFC will
> be published. Better, improve the document now, publish it and freeze it
> until the others are REC, when others documents are REC, take this one,
> and publish it as an note with small changes depending on the final REC.
> 
> ===========================
> 
> What do you think ?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> ------
> 
> ***Soohong Daniel Park*
> 
> *Samsung Electronics, DMC R&D*
> 
> http://sites.google.com/site/natpt00
>