- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:27:38 +0100
- To: "public-media-annotation@w3.org >> \"public-media-annotation@w3.org\"" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Results of Questionnaire Survey of Mapping Formats for the Media Annotation http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/Annot-format-survey/results -->19 answers have been received. --> 3 questions: 1- Media Formats preference 2- Media Formats Straw-poll 3- Choose 5 media formats Results: 1- Media Formats preference [Please indicate your preference to see the WG work on each of these Format in your particular case, from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much).] ----------------------------------- [Top 8 Formats] average 1- EXIF 3.81 2- Media RSS 3.76 3- TV-Anytime 3.73 4- Youtube 3.63 5- ID3 frames 3.57 6- MediaRDF Vocabulary (Video) 3.53 7- EBUCore 3.18 8- MPEG-7 3.17 2- Media Formats Straw-poll (Top 8) [Please indicate which formats you would like to see (or not see) the WG work on]. ----------------------------------- [Top 8 Formats] - ranking 1 Media RSS 2 Youtube 3 EBUCore 4 ID3 frames 5 EXIF 6 MPEG-7 7 TV-Anytime 8 MediaRDF Vocabulary (Video) 3- Choose 5 media formats (Top 8) [Please choose 5 formats you would like to see the WG work on]. ----------------------------------- [Top 7 Formats] number Average 1 EXIF 13 0.68 2 MPEG-7 10 0.63 3 Media RSS 11 0.58 4 Youtube 10 0.53 5 TV-Anytime 10 0.53 6 MediaRDF Vocabulary 9 0.47 7 ID3 frames 8 0.42 8 EBUCore 2 0.21 Conclusion: The following Top 5 formats seem to be a constant throughout the 3 questions. - EXIF - Media RSS - Youtube - ID3 frames - TV-Anytime Now the issues is which format do we want to retain? - Do we want to keep formats to covert different type of media (images, audio, video) ? - Do we pick simple and complex formats ? - other ? Let's discuss this during our telecon today. Thierry.
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 08:28:03 UTC