Results [2] of Questionnaire Survey of Mapping Formats for the Media

Results of Questionnaire Survey of Mapping Formats for the Media Annotation
http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/42786/Annot-format-survey/results


-->19 answers have been received.

--> 3 questions:

      1- Media Formats preference
      2- Media Formats Straw-poll
      3- Choose 5 media formats

Results:

1- Media Formats preference
[Please indicate your preference to see the WG work on each of these
Format in your particular case, from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much).]
-----------------------------------
[Top 8 Formats] average

1- EXIF				3.81
2- Media RSS 			3.76
3- TV-Anytime			3.73
4- Youtube 			3.63
5- ID3 frames 			3.57
6- MediaRDF Vocabulary (Video) 	3.53
7- EBUCore 			3.18
8- MPEG-7			3.17



2- Media Formats Straw-poll (Top 8)
[Please indicate which formats you would like to see (or not see) the WG
work on].
-----------------------------------
[Top 8 Formats] - ranking
1	Media RSS
2	Youtube
3	EBUCore
4	ID3 frames
5	EXIF
6	MPEG-7
7	TV-Anytime
8	MediaRDF Vocabulary (Video)

3- Choose 5 media formats (Top 8)
[Please choose 5 formats you would like to see the WG work on].
-----------------------------------
[Top 7 Formats]     number	Average
1 EXIF		     13    	0.68
2 MPEG-7  	     10		0.63		
3 Media RSS 	     11 	0.58
4 Youtube 	     10		0.53
5 TV-Anytime 	     10	 	0.53
6 MediaRDF Vocabulary 9   	0.47
7 ID3 frames 	      8 	0.42	
8 EBUCore 	      2		0.21

Conclusion:

The following Top 5 formats seem to be a constant throughout the 3
questions.
- EXIF 				
- Media RSS 	
- Youtube
- ID3 frames
- TV-Anytime

Now the issues is which format do we want to retain?

- Do we want to keep formats to covert different type of media (images,
audio, video) ?		
- Do we pick simple and complex formats ?
- other ?

Let's discuss this during our telecon today.

Thierry.

Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 08:28:03 UTC