- From: Tobias Bürger <tobias.buerger@sti2.at>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:52:06 +0100
- To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Dear all,, I had a look at the current version of the mapping table again yesterday. From the discussion we had regarding ID3 I think that not every mapping is 100% correct or at least leaves room for changes. And what I also learned is that the meaning of some properties get clearer when you discuss them with other members of the group. I think we could improve the mappings if we make small groups to review the mappings. Each group can pick 1 or 2 formats and then we could discuss points of the mappings which are not clear. Having these reviews is necessary if we want to publish the mapping table, I guess. Perhaps we agree on small teams in the next telecon to review the mappings - what do you think? At the next telecon all group members should have indicated their preferences via the questionaire, so there would be a basis for the definition of the groups. We can also then prioritize some formats. So just an idea... Best regards, Tobias -- _________________________________________________ Dipl.-Inf. Univ. Tobias Bürger STI Innsbruck University of Innsbruck, Austria http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/ tobias.buerger@sti2.at __________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 08:51:06 UTC