RE : RE : Ontology for Media Resource 1.0

Thierry,
 
yes, correct.  I have otherwise seen the mail from Felix asking to update
the individual tables with datatype. Feasible but ont in a glimpse.
 
Again, I can't attend tomorrow.
 
Regards,
 
JP

	-------- Message d'origine-------- 
	De: Thierry Michel [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] 
	Date: lun. 15.06.2009 10:45 
	Ā: Evain, Jean-Pierre 
	Cc: Joakim Söderberg; public-media-annotation@w3.org 
	Objet: Re: RE : Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
	
	

	Jean-Pierre,
	
	I have only included the updates sent by Wonsuk.
	
	You are probably talking about updating the "Table 0: Summary"
	
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/FirstDraft/map
ping_table.htm#table0
	
	
	Thierry.
	
	
	
	Evain, Jean-Pierre wrote:
	> Dear Thierry,
	> 
	> Thanks for updating the individual NewsML-G2, TVA and EBUCore
tabls but the
	> result is not reflected in the final table (look at e.g. locator).
I guess
	> this has to be done manually ?
	> 
	> Another comment (en passant), CableLabs individual table seems to
be much
	> more detailed than the others. Should we harmonise?
	> 
	> Thanks again and regards,
	> 
	> By the way, I am travelling and won't be able to joint the next
call.
	> Apologies.
	> 
	> Jean-Pierre
	>
	>       -------- Message d'origine--------
	>       De: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org de la part de
Thierry
	> Michel
	>       Date: ven. 12.06.2009 20:33
	>       Ā: Joakim Söderberg; public-media-annotation@w3.org
	>       Cc:
	>       Objet: Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
	>      
	>      
	>
	>       Joakim,
	>      
	>       The latest version of the Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
	>       is available at
	>      
	>      
	>
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/FirstDraft/Ove
	> rview.html
	>      
	>       associated with the mapping table
	>      
	>
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/FirstDraft/map
	> ping_table.htm
	>      
	>       Best,
	>       Thierry
	>      
	>      
	>      
	>       Joakim Söderberg wrote:
	>       > Hello,
	>       > Can you please email the link to the last version again,
so we can
	> vote for publishing!
	>       >
	>       > /Joakim
	>       >
	>      
	>      
	>      
	>
	> -----------------------------------------
	> **************************************************
	>
	> This email and any files transmitted with it
	> are confidential and intended solely for the
	> use of the individual or entity to whom they
	> are addressed.
	> If you have received this email in error,
	> please notify the system manager.
	> This footnote also confirms that this email
	> message has been swept by the mailgateway
	>
	> **************************************************
	>

Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 12:18:08 UTC