- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:55:04 +0900
- To: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Raphael, thank you for this hint, that is very helpful. I think we could do something like this after the TPAC meeting, when we have finished to some extend what we are doing now (going through use cases / requirements already available). I have marked this issue 6112. Felix Raphaël Troncy さんは書きました: > > Dear Felix, all, > >> "Requirements / use case" documents in W3C are very heterogenous: >> >> a) very short "requirements" documents like >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/CR-xquery-update-10-requirements-20080314/ >> they contain basically a list of requirements, without detailed >> discussion, and with pointers to other documents which provide the >> background >> b) very long "requirements" documents like >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-widgets-reqs-20080625/ >> which contain rationale and background explanations. The MMSEM XG work >> belongs into that category I think. > > I would like to mention another example, most likely in the middle > between a) and b), which is the SKOS use cases and requirements > document, http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-ucr/ > > The whole process for making this document is also interesting and could > be a source of inspiration for this group. The SWD WG has gathered these > requirements using mainly the wiki, see > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCRMaterial for the history of > changes. Basically, a template for UC has been agreed on, and then, the > WG found easier to harmonize all the use cases. The whole community has > been consulted, i.e., non WG members have also provided feedback and new > use cases using the wiki facility and the public mailing list. > > Raphaël >
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 00:55:41 UTC