W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > November 2008

Re: MXM Review

From: Christian Timmerer (ITEC) <christian.timmerer@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:30:27 +0100
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Message-Id: <5304150F-9049-4FDE-8FF2-06711C2D3084@itec.uni-klu.ac.at>
To: Víctor Rodríguez Doncel <victorr@ac.upc.edu>

Dear Victor,
   thanks for that. I'd like to comment on some of your statements:
  - Broad scope and complexity: Comprehensiveness does not necessarily  
include complexity.
  - Early stage: I think we go to CD at the next meeting in February  
  - Programming language for the API specification: the API is  
specified using UML; reference software will be in Java and/or C++
  - How will the API be coupled to the ontology? Within the reference  

Hope this helps.
Best regards,

On Nov 19, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Víctor Rodríguez Doncel wrote:

> Dear all,
> As a response to ACTION41 I have just uploaded a new web, briefly  
> describing MPEG's MXM API and comparing it to the Media Objects API.  
> I hope it is of interest.
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/MXM
> Regards,
> VictorRodriguez

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 12:31:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:30 UTC