AW: useDM structure-behaviour relationship

Dear Heiko,

I would like to pass this question to Marc Seissler (in cc). He has
developed useDM in his PhD thesis on the basis on DISL.

@Marc:
Could you please answer to Heiko and the group directly? Thanks.

Best regards
Gerrit

========================
Dr.-Ing. Gerrit Meixner
Head of the Human-Machine-Interaction group

German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
Innovative Factory Systems (IFS)
Trippstadter Strasse 122
67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany

Tel./Fax/Mobile/E-Mail/Web
+49 (0) 631 / 205 75 3415
+49 (0) 631 / 205 75 3402
+49 (0) 157 / 725 95 865
Gerrit.Meixner@dfki.de
http://www.dfki.de
========================
Legal statement: 
Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122
67663 Kaiserslautern

Geschäftsführung: 
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender), Dr. Walter
Olthoff 
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: 
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
========================

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Heiko Braun [mailto:hbraun@redhat.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Januar 2013 16:03
An: public-mbui@w3.org
Betreff: useDM structure-behaviour relationship


I think this is a question for Gerrit, but it relates to the recent
behaviour model discussions:

You probably have seen the recent producer/consumer ideas to express
relationships between structure and behaviour. I was looking at the useDM
papers and was wondering if useDM actually expresses a relation between the
structure and the behaviour somehow. For instance, how does a "navigation"
refer to the target interaction unit. Or how would a "trigger" that leads to
a function call express  this relation?

Regards, Heiko

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2013 06:36:58 UTC