Re: Second draft - Research Section

Recommended edit:

The maturity models evaluated differ in scope, structure, intended audience
and, in addition to general-purpose frameworks, are tailored to specific
industries.

*Dr.  Keith Newton *(Call me "Dr. Keith")
Executive Leader and Strategic a11y in Digital Accessibility Experience
614-654-4116 <%28614%29%20654-4116> |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-keith-newton  | newtonsgroove2@gmail.com


On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 10:53 AM Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
wrote:

> Looks good, except for the extra . in the first sentence.
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles
>
> EOM
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:40 AM
> *To:* Sheri Byrne-Haber <sheri@sheribyrne.com>; public-maturity@w3.org <
> public-maturity@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: Second draft - Research Section
>
>
> Sheri,
>
>
>
> Looks good! Please see my proposed edits.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: A picture containing text, black, clock Description automatically
> generated] <http://strategicaccessibility.com/>
>
>  Jeff@strategicaccessibility.com
>
>  5  1  2   .   4  2  6   .   9   7  7  9
>
>
>
> *From: *Sheri Byrne-Haber <sheri@sheribyrne.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 7:24 AM
> *To: *public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
> *Subject: *Second draft - Research Section
>
>
> Attached as a MS Word document
>
> Sheri
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 15:01:44 UTC