Re: Second draft - Research Section

Looks good, except for the extra . in the first sentence.


Thanks

Charles

EOM



________________________________
From: Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 7:40 AM
To: Sheri Byrne-Haber <sheri@sheribyrne.com>; public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Second draft - Research Section


Sheri,



Looks good! Please see my proposed edits.



Regards,





[A picture containing text, black, clock  Description automatically generated]<http://strategicaccessibility.com/>

 Jeff@strategicaccessibility.com

 5  1  2   .   4  2  6   .   9   7  7  9



From: Sheri Byrne-Haber <sheri@sheribyrne.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 at 7:24 AM
To: public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
Subject: Second draft - Research Section

Attached as a MS Word document

Sheri

Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2025 14:53:06 UTC