Re: My Proposed Edits to the Introduction

We have the list of other models in the research section don’t we? I see no need to list them twice 
Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 22, 2025, at 2:52 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> 
> David, Sheri, All:
> 
> I've finally done some, hopefully most of my edits. I've moved a few
> things about:
> 
> *    I've moved Key Terms to the bottom and renamed it to Glossary of
> *    Key Terms. I made it's own H2. It's at the bottom just in case
> *    the task force cares about the current section numbering. We
> *    could bring it back to it's own H2 section below the
> *    Introduction, but that would renumber everything that follows.
> 
> *    I'm concerned about the references to other MM considered. We
> *    list only ISO/IEC 30071. We should either add more to the list,
> *    and be fairly comprehensive, or drop this section, imo. I prefer
> *    the former, but that could be a bit of work to accomplish.
> 
> You can view the edits here:
> 
> http://raw.githack.com/w3c/maturity-model/intro-js/

> 
> A pull request is available at:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/pull/267

> 
> Best,
> Janina
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka

> 
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures    http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

> 
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/

>

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2025 01:57:09 UTC