Re: My Proposed Edits to the Introduction

Hi Janina,

I would support dropping the section on other MMs, as I feel like it doesn’t really add benefit to the Document, and could possible create some confusion to readers and potential users.

At the time it was done, as I recall, it was more included as background and justification to APA and others within the W3C.



Regards,


[A picture containing text, black, clock  Description automatically generated]<http://strategicaccessibility.com/>
 Jeff@strategicaccessibility.com
 5  1  2   .   4  2  6   .   9   7  7  9

From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
Date: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 at 4:53 AM
To: David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com>
Cc: Maturity Model TF <public-maturity@w3.org>
Subject: My Proposed Edits to the Introduction
David, Sheri, All:

I've finally done some, hopefully most of my edits. I've moved a few
things about:

*       I've moved Key Terms to the bottom and renamed it to Glossary of
*       Key Terms. I made it's own H2. It's at the bottom just in case
*       the task force cares about the current section numbering. We
*       could bring it back to it's own H2 section below the
*       Introduction, but that would renumber everything that follows.

*       I'm concerned about the references to other MM considered. We
*       list only ISO/IEC 30071. We should either add more to the list,
*       and be fairly comprehensive, or drop this section, imo. I prefer
*       the former, but that could be a bit of work to accomplish.

You can view the edits here:

http://raw.githack.com/w3c/maturity-model/intro-js/


A pull request is available at:

https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/pull/267


Best,
Janina


--

Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka


The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa


Linux Foundation Fellow
https://www.linuxfoundation.org/board-of-directors-2/