Re: New Editors Note for 2.4.1

Sure. 
A quick check, if the draft of the document at: https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/blob/main/index.html <https://github.com/w3c/maturity-model/blob/main/index.html> ?

Best,

Roy

> 2023年8月17日 23:02，David Fazio <dfazio@helixopp.com> 写道：
> 
> Hi, Roy. We are ready to publish a new working draft for our Maturity Model. Can you process it, please?
>  
> Thank you...
>  
>  
>  
> From: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
> Date: Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 7:46 AM
> To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> Cc: public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: New Editors Note for 2.4.1
> 
>  
> Sheri’s changes were added and pushed as a PR which David has accepted and merged into main.  I think we are ready to have Roy push this to the latest Working Draft from our editors draft.
>  
> Thanks
> Charles
> EOM
>  
> From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
> Date: Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 6:17 AM
> To: Jeff Kline <jeffrey.l.kline@gmail.com>
> Cc: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>, public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: New Editors Note for 2.4.1
> 
> Respectfully, I don't think "concept phase" adds either clarity or
> additional information to the "work in progress" phrase. I'm liking
> Sheri's version especially because it clarifies what phrases apply to
> the spreadsheet, and which to the document itself.
> 
> The other suggested note looks fine to me, but I would add "request
> comment" language where we "anticipate" the changes enumerated.
> 
> Key point with an updated WD is to get comments from individuals and
> organizations not already engaged in our work.
> 
> Janina
> 
> Jeff Kline writes:
> >    Charles, I took the liberty of a little wordsmithing.
> > 
> >    Feel free to use it, or modify it as you like.
> > 
> >    Thank you for doing this!
> > 
> >    Jeff
> > 
> >    This spreadsheet is in concept phase and is  therefore a work in
> >    progress. The [1]proof points within each [2]dimension may not be in
> >    sync between this document and what is contained in the latest
> >    iteration of excel spreadsheet template.
> > 
> >    Also, as long as you’re in there, could you add this editors note as
> >    well, regarding the support dimension, which we discussed a bit this
> >    morning:
> > 
> >    “ Editors note on the Support Dimension:
> > 
> >    We anticipate some substantive revisions to the proof points currently
> >    shown in this dimension to:
> > 
> >    1. Ensure relevancy to the support dimension with regard to information
> >    technology.
> > 
> >    2. Reduce the number of proof points that are repetitive or overlap
> >    with the proof points from other dimensions.
> > 
> >    3. Eliminate proof points that may be considered too granular or low
> >    level tasks that would likely be part of other more significant proof
> >    points”
> > 
> >    I’m certainly open to feedback with regard to this editors note as
> >    well.
> > 
> >    Thanks again, Charles!!!
> > 
> >    Jeff
> > 
> >      On Aug 16, 2023, at 1:46 PM, Charles LaPierre
> >      <charlesl@benetech.org> wrote:
> > 
> >    
> > 
> >    Well what does everyone think?  Is this paragraph good to go?
> > 
> > 
> >    Thanks
> > 
> >    Charles
> > 
> >    EOM
> > 
> > 
> >    From: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
> >    Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:03 AM
> >    To: public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
> >    Subject: New Editors Note for 2.4.1
> > 
> >    How does this sound?
> > 
> > 
> >    EDITOR'S NOTE
> > 
> >    This spreadsheet is experimental and is a work in progress.
> >    The [3]proof points of each [4]dimension may not be in sync between
> >    this document and what is in the latest excel spreadsheet template
> >    which currently has the latest set of [5]proof points.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >    Thanks
> > 
> >    Charles
> > 
> >    EOM
> > 
> > 
> >    Charles LaPierre
> > 
> >    Principal, Accessibility and Content Quality Architect
> > 
> >    Benetech
> > 
> >    Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
> > 
> > References
> > 
> >    1. file:///tmp/mutt.html#dfn-proof-point <x-msg://1/#REDACTED>
> >    2. file:///tmp/mutt.html#dfn-dimension <x-msg://1/#REDACTED>
> >    3. file:///tmp/mutt.html#dfn-proof-point <x-msg://1/#REDACTED>
> >    4. file:///tmp/mutt.html#dfn-dimension <x-msg://1/#REDACTED>
> >    5. file:///tmp/mutt.html#dfn-proof-point <x-msg://1/#REDACTED>
> 
> -- 
> 
> Janina Sajka (she/her/hers)
> Accessibility Consultant https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka <https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka>
> 
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures     http://www.w3.org/wai/apa <http://www.w3.org/wai/apa>
> 
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.linuxfoundation.org%2fboard-of-directors-2%2f&c=E,1,f32vhHTrw_SNeCN_W23AJoptV6hVTMy5KHFNQ4bo6Pw88gVVBF9v0A1LU9Muri8mVchtNJdhXPoW1yt90N7-WYHmikbD16fsXRzap6C4P0yrstVApVlL8x_6CuW1&typo=1 <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.linuxfoundation.org%2fboard-of-directors-2%2f&c=E,1,f32vhHTrw_SNeCN_W23AJoptV6hVTMy5KHFNQ4bo6Pw88gVVBF9v0A1LU9Muri8mVchtNJdhXPoW1yt90N7-WYHmikbD16fsXRzap6C4P0yrstVApVlL8x_6CuW1&typo=1>