- From: Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:24:48 +0000
- To: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>, "public-maturity@w3.org" <public-maturity@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BYAPR05MB4600C6CCE1A950B1CD22DA2DC2919@BYAPR05MB4600.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Communications and support are probably the two that need the most work. The people who started on those dimensions had to drop out of participating. Thanks, Sheri ----- Sheri Byrne-Haber (She/Her) Senior Staff, Accessibility Architect Mobile: 650 703 2376 (please text first if you have not called me before, otherwise it may go to VM) Upcoming OOO March 13 (EPIC holiday) Working from Arizona 4/11 through 4/17 April 21 (EPIC holiday) Expect a delay in my replies Phonetic pronunciation: shei riə bUHRn heɪ buhr Audio: https://vimeo.com/665808784 ASL Name Sign: https://vimeo.com/665809840 From: Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org> Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2023 11:19 AM To: public-maturity@w3.org Cc: Sheri Byrne Haber <sbyrnehaber@vmware.com> Subject: Template issue found? !! External Email Hi Sheri et all. So, I am starting to go through the new excel spreadsheet and think that sub-topics should not be included and not have any options to mark as complete or not and also not included in the “Remaining proofpoints in this dimension to be assessed” For example, in 3.1 Communications In the document we have. * Consistent use of accessible templates for: * Marketing and sales materials delivered in electronic formats * Technical documents or position papers * Product Accessibility Conformance Reports<file:///Users/charlesl/GitRepos/maturity-model/index.html#dfn-acr> (ACRs) * Other accessibility documentation * Presentations However Consistent use of accessible templates for: (Do we really want to be able to mark this with 0-4 rating?) Same for: * Internal and external websites: * are accessible per regional regulatory requirements (e.g. conforms to WCAG) * may have an accessibility statement (legal requirement for websites for public sector bodies in the European Union) * may contain a statement of commitment to accessibility Internal and external websites: And maybe even Products and services: accessibility compliance documentation is available and delivered in an accessible format (on the website, by request, or through procurement process) There may be others in other dimensions, I am still working through all of them. Not sure for example Documented testing steps and cadence for agile delivery of changes that do not go through a full release cycle. Some examples are: * Content review for website updates * Content review for social media posts Just wondering how we should handle these. Currently all 3 are included but should it only be the sub-bullet points in these cases, do we need to include a “other” option which can be filled out in the comment section. Thoughts? Thanks Charles EOM Charles LaPierre Principal, Accessibility and Content Quality Architect Benetech Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y !! External Email: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender.
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2023 18:25:02 UTC