- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 17:36:53 -0700
- To: Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-mathml4@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkD+jPXtyk4+noOooHboWmLg8fqP2KAWjoXYNB2KoYM6KA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Deyan. I don't think we can repurpose alttext. I know at least
Design Science used it in one of their products and I think others did
also. I know your proposal is to repurpose it when a functional notation is
used, but that still doesn't seem right.
I did a thesaurus search a few days ago. Here are some things I turned up
and also threw in a few other terms (one as a joke) we talked about in the
past in the hopes that one of them inspires someone:
- annotation
- relevant
- conforms
- definition
- meaning
- significance
- definition
- description
- explanation
- narration
- commentary
- speech
- apropos
- insinuation
- interpretation
- pertinent
- concept
- clarification
- explanation
- hint
- mathrole or mrole
Of these, I like "annotation" and "interpretation" the most (although both
are rather long), followed by "mathrole"/"mrole" (a specialization of
ARIA's "role").
Note: one online dictionary's second meaning for "interpretation" is "an
explanation of the meaning of another's artistic or creative work; an
elucidation". Seems apropos for remediation...
As an alternative to "subject", maybe "context", although I think "subject"
is well understood and "context" is vague as to what values it might want
to take.
Neil
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avg.com
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:57 PM Deyan Ginev <deyan.ginev@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Neil, all,
>
> Names are tricky to brainstorm on the spot, so here's a seeding email with
> another direction we haven't discussed (I think?).
>
> I recalled MathML has had "alttext" and "altimg" for some time, exactly
> for accessibility purposes. So one suggestion trying to keep with the
> spirit of MathML 3 could be to introduce an "alttree" attribute for the
> tree-like annotations we have been discussing. Or slightly removed from
> those details, maybe "altcontent" ?
>
> An even more conservative take would be to outright use the existing
> "alttext", but specify custom handling when its values match our new
> annotation syntax.
>
> In a more literary direction, attribute names such as "readout" or
> "narration" feel appealing to a point, but may be too detached from the
> technical details... I only find them preferable when comparing to
> "semantics".
>
> Greetings,
> Deyan
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:33 PM Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> We meet again on Thursday, 24 Sept at 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern, 7pm
>> Central European Time.
>>
>> One thing to think about before the meeting is a different name for what
>> we are currently calling the "semantics" attribute. Most people agree
>> that is too loaded a word and we should figure out another name for it.
>> Potentially, "subject" should also be changed and if there is a synergistic
>> pair, that would be great.
>>
>> Agenda:
>> 1. Charter
>> a) timeline for getting things done
>> b) better name than "semantics" -- need something for charter usage
>> 2. Semantics names -- continue discussion with Deyan's google doc as a
>> framework
>> a) More discussion on the meaning/purpose of the various levels
>> b) Amount of details: (still unresolved) "millimeter" vs "unit";
>> "hydrogen" vs "element", etc.
>> 3. Continued discussion on "semantics"
>> a) continue discussion of David C's idea to deal with alignment
>> b) continue discussion on n-ary operators, especially +/- and
>> relational operators
>>
>>
>>
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
>> www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>> <#m_-8764556289107552452_m_-1760061647730373200_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2020 00:37:20 UTC