Re: Minutes: MathML Core Meeting of August 3, 2020

On 04/08/2020 01:49, Neil Soiffer wrote:
> There are 28 MathML Core issues with "needs resolution"

FWIW, I don't know if "needs resolution" correspond to the highest
priority or is actually up-to-date. Also I think someone (from W3C?)
said we shouldn't use this kind of label. The thing is that I used to
put this label by default, but probably didn't always remove it e.g.
when we decided not to put it in core level 1 (as we could come back to
this in the future).

Anyway I think now core is in relatively good state, the issue labels on
the spec corresponds to think we can't decide immediately in the group ;
we should wait upstream work and CSS/WHATWG discussions. BTW, there was
more feedback about mpadded incompat with CSS, which are blocking the
upstreaming, so I wonder whether level 1 should simplify it even more
(or remove it).

-- 
Frédéric Wang