- From: Frédéric Wang <fwang@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:32:54 +0100
- To: public-mathml4@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 16:33:32 UTC
On 19/02/2019 17:29, David Carlisle wrote: > > I'd suggest that mostly we use mathml-core as I think that the main item > of business should be to get that specified, then once that is clearer > we can look at what to say about the remaining parts of mathml (some > bits will need to be removed, some bits deprecated, and some bits just > marked as "not in core") > > Note that github has a beta feature that means that issues can be > transferred between repositories in the same organisation, so if we > decide that some existing issues should be moved, we can move them from > mathml-core to mathml or in the other direction. @David: can you please all what I opened into mathml-core then? We can then introduce some labels "MathML core" and "MathML 4". That would make issues easier to search. -- Frédéric Wang
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 16:33:32 UTC