Re: Collection of pages using native MathML?

>
> there is also the original mathml test suite at W3C of course.
>
>
> Right, I can use it too although my preference would be for "concrete"
> content rather than tests
>
>
Real world examples will give you realistic speed comparisons and help with
robustness, but a test suite will be much better at testing robustness and
correctness of your implementation and any polyfills. The collections,
especially if they are generated from TeX, won't test whole categories of
functionality. E.g,. mpadded, mphantom, or stretchy min/max may not be part
of the output of the converters. Having said that, the MathML test suite is
a disaster in terms of being focused -- lots of people contributed tests so
there is a ton of overlap in what is tested. Still, it does ASFAIK cover
all element and all attributes and includes some tests that were meant to
challenge implementations in terms of size of expression and speed of
MathML rendering (see Torture Tests section). I was pleased to see that
Firefox does a pretty good job for many of these Torture tests, especially
speed-wise, when I just checked.

Neil Soiffer

Received on Monday, 5 August 2019 17:26:48 UTC