- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:25:59 +0000
- To: public-markdown@w3.org
On 28 November 2012 18:18, David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com> wrote: >> Would you do it please, lets see it? post para should be superfluous, >> otherwise para termination isn't valid? > > Hrm... what about this possibility (using EBNF): > > (TEXT SP SP EOL BLANKLINE) > > That should translate to: > > <p>Content of text<br /></p> I hoped you'd omit <br/> until we did inlines? > > Or something similar, however if you take away the PARAPOST you get: > > <p>Content of text</p> > > Do we want to allow for that edge-case? text\n\n isn't an edge case? Surely it's standard usage? or do you mean the br? Yes, but not yet (is my view). Get a solid basis then build on it? Always my approach (slower but gets there more reliably - I hope) regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:26:27 UTC