- From: David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:21:05 -0500
- To: public-markdown@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:21:57 UTC
* Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com> [2012-11-28 09:36 -0500]: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:05 AM, David J. Weller-Fahy <dave-lists-public-markdown@weller-fahy.com> wrote: > > > Does that make more sense? > > This leads me to consider the applicability of an explicit EBNF > grammar. Would that be opening a can of worms? You know, I actually considered that approach early on, and decided to hold off to see how things went. But I think it may be necessary. -- dave [ please don't CC me ]
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 15:21:57 UTC