I agree - the number of hash marks after the header is irrelevant to the
processor. I am sure we can express the parsing rules as regular
expressions pretty easily.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <
pablo@glatelier.org> wrote:
> On 21 November 2012 23:17, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote:
> >
> > Le 21 nov. 2012 à 23:37, Joshua Kalis a écrit :
> >> I think that the underline syntax is ugly and needless with '# header'
> or '# header #'.
> >
> > We do not have the choice.
> >
> > Babelmark2 shows that most of processors support the three syntaxes.
> > http://bit.ly/Ug3yfj
>
> I added the "asymmetric" hash
>
> # header 1 #############
>
> http://bit.ly/UXMZa4
>
> That has to be supported too.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX
> http://www.glatelier.org/
> http://about.me/pablox/
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/
> Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/
>
>
--
Shane P. McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.