- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 08:24:30 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 22 November 2012 02:28, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote: > On 21 November 2012 23:17, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: >> >> Le 21 nov. 2012 à 23:37, Joshua Kalis a écrit : >>> I think that the underline syntax is ugly and needless with '# header' or '# header #'. >> >> We do not have the choice. >> >> Babelmark2 shows that most of processors support the three syntaxes. >> http://bit.ly/Ug3yfj > > I added the "asymmetric" hash > > # header 1 ############# > > http://bit.ly/UXMZa4 > > That has to be supported too. No Pablo, it doesn't. We don't need to have a quirks mode, to faithfully follow prior bad art? We can get compliance with the majority on a subset of well defined syntax and leave the quirks to 'app-specific' profile. You do raise a good point with error recovery though. Never addressed AFAICT. Should we define that in the spec? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 08:25:12 UTC