- From: Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:13:42 -0300
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On 20 November 2012 15:40, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 November 2012 18:30, Ryan Freebern <rfreebern@unionstmedia.com> wrote: >> "text/x-markdown" indicates that the content-type is experimental. Since our >> goal is to eventually formalize markdown as a standard, it doesn't make >> sense for our endorsed content-type (if any) to be experimental. However, >> RFC4288 says that content-types in the standards tree "MUST correspond to a >> formal publication by a recognized standards body", so until the markdown >> standard is much more mature we can't expect a text/markdown (or similar) >> content-type to be accepted by the IESG. > > 1. Isn't that an issue for a server, i.e. not for a MD document? > the only impact on this group is if we wish to add something to indicate > the content-type. With the discussions to date, that is a 'later' issue, once > we have defined a baseline. > I have added to the collated issues list. Maybe I'm a bit confused, but that media type isn't the same as MIME type? Like for example nautilus "identify" as markdown and there "open with". Regards, -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://www.glatelier.org/ http://about.me/pablox/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 22:14:41 UTC