- From: Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:28:00 -0600
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOk_reEirwzxYD+pnj-YYX_Wn586siE=9g5cwgC_rik=rq4ivA@mail.gmail.com>
Sure - there are good schema for XHTML 1.1 and HTML 4. My (admittedly biased) preference would be for XHTML 1.1 with suitable limitations so it just works in an HTML 4/5 user agent. I agree that we cannot rely upon any HTML5 extensions in basic specification. HTML5 has not yet even entered last call - it is stabilizing, but not stable. If people are open to my ARIA suggestions, then there is a XHTML+ARIA schema out there we could use. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20 November 2012 13:34, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > > Earlier people mentioned polyglot markup and it seemed to scare others. > > Polyglot is an HTML5-introduced term for something we defined way back > when > > for XHTML 1.0. It just means markup that is valid XHTML and also works > well > > in HTML user agents. The current generation polyglot spec is at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/html-polyglot/ > > > > In my mind it is trivial to have MD output polyglot - and it means it is > > readily parseable in an XML toolchain if someone wants to do something > cool > > with the output. > > Is there a schema against which output could be generated? > If it's html5, I'd suggest it is not firm as yet, hence currently out of > scope? > > regards > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On 20 November 2012 13:19, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: > >> > >> >> I really don't think a processing chain is within spec for the group > >> >> Shane? Do you? > >> > > >> > > >> > No. I was just saying that we could define one for our own internal > use > >> > if > >> > we wanted to author the spec in MD but still produce W3C-appropriate > >> > (X)HTML > >> > output. > >> > >> Karl has kindly offered to do that for us, but agreed, it would > >> perhaps be of use for others. > >> another advantage of generating xhtml as apposed to html? > >> > >> regards > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dave Pawson > >> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > >> Docbook FAQ. > >> http://www.dpawson.co.uk > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Shane P. McCarron > > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > > > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > http://www.dpawson.co.uk > > -- Shane P. McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 16:28:27 UTC