- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:19:32 +0000
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
If you feel that filename extensions should be within scope, please speak up. regards On 20 November 2012 04:10, Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org> wrote: > On 19 November 2012 22:07, Brandon Frohs <bfrohs@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: >>> Usually I have seen the current extension used for Markdown files: >>> >>> .md >>> .mdown >>> .markdown >> >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Shane McCarron <ahby@aptest.com> wrote: >>> I have seen .mkd as well. >> >> It should be noted .md, .markdown, and .mkd are recognized in Ubuntu >> 12.10 as "Markdown document (text/x-markdown)" (.mdown is *not* >> recognized). > > There was another thread just talking about document content. In my > experience, most used extensions (in order of frequency): > > .md > .markdown > .mkd > > (First time I see .mdown) > > Considering afaik, most platforms already understand those three as > "markdown" documents (github, ubuntu for example). Maybe we should > stay with them. Or remove one (3 extensions seems a bit too much). > > Regards, > -- > Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX > http://www.glatelier.org/ > http://about.me/pablox/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ > Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/ > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 08:19:59 UTC