Re: Quick Question on FWPD

čt 20. 11. 2025 v 8:03 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin <
pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal:

> On 11/19/25 22:01, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> pá 9. 5. 2025 v 14:46 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin <
> pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal:
>
>>
>> On 09/05/2025 11:34, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> st 19. 3. 2025 v 9:40 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin <
>> pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal:
>>
>>>
>>> On 19/03/2025 08:56, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> st 19. 3. 2025 v 8:49 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin <
>>> pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal:
>>>
>>>> Hi Melvin, Wonsuk,
>>>>
>>>> time flies, doesn'it! 😅
>>>>
>>>> The answer is simply that we are a little late on out charter: we are
>>>> still focusing on the Use Case documents, and have not published any draft
>>>> for the specification itself. You haven't missed anything :)
>>>>
>>>> For future reference: all publications of the WG (including drafts)
>>>> will be listed here:
>>>>     https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/lws/publications/
>>>> and this list is maintained automatically, so you can rely on it being
>>>> up-to-date.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Pierre.
>>>
>>> Would you be able to share a sentence or two on what it might look like?
>>>
>>> The group has not discussed any specifics yet, so I'd rather not make
>>> any prediction, sorry.
>>>
>>
>> Just noticed we’re a third of the way through the WG—any thoughts on when
>> a FPWD might land?
>>
>> I'm afraid not.
>>
>>
>> The use case doc is rich (maybe too rich!). In the Social WG we picked a
>> smaller slice to start with, which helped keep momentum. Could that work
>> here too?
>>
>> It is the picking a smaller slice that we are still working on.
>>
>>
>> Would be lovely to have something public before the halfway mark. Helps
>> those of us building stuff align a bit.
>>
>> It would :) Working on it, but can't make any promise.
>>
>
> Hi, I was wondering if there has been any update about FPWD, or some new
> developments at TPAC?
>
> The group did not meet during TPAC, but we had a very productive F2F
> meeting on October, in Gent.
>
> Work on the spec per se has really taken off, as you can tell from the
> activity on https://github.com/w3c/lws-protocol .
>

Thanks, Pierre, that looks very promising! Are you looking for
implementers, or is it too soon?


>   best
>
>
>
>>   pa
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Melvin
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I don’t expect you to be held to anything, but I’d really appreciate
>>> getting a sense of the direction it’s heading in. As an app developer, this
>>> would help me future-proof my implementations.
>>>
>>> I’m familiar with Solid, remotestorage, and unhosted apps, though I know
>>> less about the Fedora side of things.
>>>
>>> In short, what abstractions or generalizations should a Solid app
>>> developer anticipate when working with LWS?
>>>
>>> If I had to guess, it would be designed for client-side (unhosted) apps,
>>> supporting a range of identity and authentication systems (including but
>>> not limited to WebID), multiple data formats (including RDF, and possibly
>>> JSON?), and a set of access control plugins.
>>>
>>> Obviously, the FPWD will clarify things, but even a rough sense of
>>> direction—whether subjective or opinionated (with the usual
>>> disclaimers)—would be very helpful for those of us following from a
>>> distance.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Melvin
>>>
>>>>   best
>>>> On 18/03/2025 02:46, 이원석 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi. Melvin and all.
>>>> Thanks to Melvin to raise this issue. I also have same question for the
>>>> group.
>>>> I hope to be prepared the base document for this work.
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Wonsuk.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>> <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
>>>> To: <public-lws-wg@w3.org> <public-lws-wg@w3.org>;
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: 2025-03-18 (화) 09:13:13 (UTC+09:00)
>>>> Subject: Quick Question on FWPD
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I saw in the Linked Web Storage Charter that the FWPD was expected
>>>> around March 11, 2025. Just wondering—has it been published yet, or has the
>>>> timeline shifted?
>>>>
>>>> If it's not ready yet, is there an overview available that explains how
>>>> the different storage approaches fit together under one umbrella? As an app
>>>> developer, I'd love to align my work with the direction this group is
>>>> taking, and a bit of guidance would be really helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Appreciate any insights!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Melvin
>>>>
>>>>