- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:03:05 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>, public-lws-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <359bf1c2-e5ef-4b39-8ac6-da44cfa05158@w3.org>
On 11/19/25 22:01, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > pá 9. 5. 2025 v 14:46 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin > <pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal: > > > On 09/05/2025 11:34, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >> >> >> st 19. 3. 2025 v 9:40 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin >> <pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal: >> >> >> On 19/03/2025 08:56, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> >>> >>> st 19. 3. 2025 v 8:49 odesílatel Pierre-Antoine Champin >>> <pierre-antoine@w3.org> napsal: >>> >>> Hi Melvin, Wonsuk, >>> >>> time flies, doesn'it! 😅 >>> >>> The answer is simply that we are a little late on out >>> charter: we are still focusing on the Use Case >>> documents, and have not published any draft for the >>> specification itself. You haven't missed anything :) >>> >>> For future reference: all publications of the WG >>> (including drafts) will be listed here: >>> https://www.w3.org/groups/wg/lws/publications/ >>> and this list is maintained automatically, so you can >>> rely on it being up-to-date. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, Pierre. >>> >>> Would you be able to share a sentence or two on what it >>> might look like? >> >> The group has not discussed any specifics yet, so I'd rather >> not make any prediction, sorry. >> >> >> Just noticed we’re a third of the way through the WG—any thoughts >> on when a FPWD might land? > I'm afraid not. >> >> The use case doc is rich (maybe too rich!). In the Social WG we >> picked a smaller slice to start with, which helped keep momentum. >> Could that work here too? > It is the picking a smaller slice that we are still working on. >> >> Would be lovely to have something public before the halfway mark. >> Helps those of us building stuff align a bit. > > It would :) Working on it, but can't make any promise. > > > Hi, I was wondering if there has been any update about FPWD, or some > new developments at TPAC? The group did not meet during TPAC, but we had a very productive F2F meeting on October, in Gent. Work on the spec per se has really taken off, as you can tell from the activity on https://github.com/w3c/lws-protocol . best > pa > >> >> Cheers, >> Melvin >> >>> >>> I don’t expect you to be held to anything, but I’d really >>> appreciate getting a sense of the direction it’s heading in. >>> As an app developer, this would help me future-proof my >>> implementations. >>> >>> I’m familiar with Solid, remotestorage, and unhosted apps, >>> though I know less about the Fedora side of things. >>> >>> In short, what abstractions or generalizations should a >>> Solid app developer anticipate when working with LWS? >>> >>> If I had to guess, it would be designed for client-side >>> (unhosted) apps, supporting a range of identity and >>> authentication systems (including but not limited to WebID), >>> multiple data formats (including RDF, and possibly JSON?), >>> and a set of access control plugins. >>> >>> Obviously, the FPWD will clarify things, but even a rough >>> sense of direction—whether subjective or opinionated (with >>> the usual disclaimers)—would be very helpful for those of us >>> following from a distance. >>> >>> Best, >>> Melvin >>> >>> best >>> >>> On 18/03/2025 02:46, 이원석 wrote: >>>> Hi. Melvin and all. >>>> Thanks to Melvin to raise this issue. I also have same >>>> question for the group. >>>> I hope to be prepared the base document for this work. >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Wonsuk. >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>>> <mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >>>> To: <public-lws-wg@w3.org> <mailto:public-lws-wg@w3.org>; >>>> Cc: >>>> Sent: 2025-03-18 (화) 09:13:13 (UTC+09:00) >>>> Subject: Quick Question on FWPD >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I saw in the Linked Web Storage Charter that the FWPD >>>> was expected around March 11, 2025. Just wondering—has >>>> it been published yet, or has the timeline shifted? >>>> >>>> If it's not ready yet, is there an overview available >>>> that explains how the different storage approaches fit >>>> together under one umbrella? As an app developer, I'd >>>> love to align my work with the direction this group is >>>> taking, and a bit of guidance would be really helpful. >>>> >>>> Appreciate any insights! >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Melvin >>>>
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2025 07:03:08 UTC