- From: Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 12:04:01 -0800
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <A51ACD94-F9AC-45E5-8641-19A9F41EDACA@generaltitles.com>
And to follow up my previous post I wonder if misunderstandings relating to the meaning of “font-stroke-contrast" versus actual "visual contrast" is what led to this weird myth that seems to persist on the internet today, claiming that "some people need low contrast text”. ??? I have been searching for credible research that might affirm the assertion “some people need lower contrast” but I'm not finding much relevant … And I am increasingly thinking, that some may have read "low contrast font” in some paper but are misinterpreting it to mean low contrast colors, when it actually means having a font with a more uniform stroke width. > On Jan 2, 2023, at 11:40 AM, Andrew Somers <andy@generaltitles.com> wrote: > > Thank you Laura, that's a very interesting study, and directly echoes my personal viewpoint on this particular subject. > > I want to make a note here for anybody that reads this study: > > The study uses the term "stroke contrast". It's very important to recognize that in the context that they are using it, stroke-contrast relates to the variation in stroke within a particular glyph. > > And the effect is exactly opposite of the actual visual contrast. > > In other words in the context of font contrast as in the stroke-contrast within a glyph, e.g. Times New Roman has very high stroke contrast. > > But the visual contrast of Times is lower than that of Helvetica. Helvetica, having a uniform stroke width therefore has a low stroke contrast but (perhaps counterintuitively) that results with its visual contrast as higher. > > Here's an example: > > <Screen Shot 2023-01-02 at 11.35.14 AM.png> > > > >> On Dec 27, 2022, at 8:17 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com <mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Fyi: >> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691822003250 <https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691822003250> >> >> Kind Regards, >> Laura >> >> -- >> Laura L. Carlson >> >
Received on Monday, 2 January 2023 20:04:19 UTC