Discussing the Contents page for supplemental guidance

Dear all

On the call today it was clear that the word document that I sent round a few weeks ago had not been received by everybody, so I have attached again to this email.

Please bear in mind this is intended as a document for discussion. However, it is also clear that editing word documents and emailing them round is not the most efficient way of collaborating to review and edit content in the form of tables.

At the very end of the call today, I think it was agreed that the chairs would propose a platform in which the sort of content could be edited, reviewed and discussed. This may, or may not, be Google sheets for example.

So, as soon as the platform is confirmed, we can perhaps incorporate the original HTML version of this content https://w3c.github.io/low-vision-a11y-tf/sandbox/Supplemental%20Guidance.html  into this platform, and the attached discussion document, and encourage other people to propose alternative structures for review and discussion.

I will look forward to further discussions on this topic, thanks to all.

Best wishes

Sam Waller
University of Cambridge, Engineering Design Centre
01223 332826