- From: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 13:30:14 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+=z1WkhPNvFy+w+HkXNLtJrc3be0te4ufChdTj60-9MOEbbSA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Alastair on the test page you provided (Thanks!!) the examples on 15 allowed the browser focus to appear. I added outline: 0; to 15b, c, and d. new page at https://www.tsbvi.edu/web/tests/focus-more-visible3.html additional thoughts looking at the dark examples 11-13 on 12 you have - Adjacent colors (either): Pass, the light-grey outline contrasts with the adjacent background. Bad Result yet the same focus color is used on example 11 and similarly contrasting focus color on 11b - they do not get the 'bad result' designation on adjacent colors. I think they should. I added an example 13b to test outset vs inset outline. We will discuss the new examples and the worrisome "bad results" tomorrow. SC Rule change needed? Jim On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 6:15 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for the minutes Laura, I'm just catching up after vacation. > > I saw the focus-visible discussion, I thought it would be worth pointing > to an updated version of the test page: > https://alastairc.uk/tests/wcag22-examples/focus-more-visible-2.html > > Of particular interest for the discussion are the last couple of examples, > where it demonstrates the outline separation and size aspects (examples 14 > & 15). > > I'm not sure what the conclusion was of the discussion, but there was > something about needing examples, and I already had those... > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > -- Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756 voice 512.206.9315 fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/ "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 18:29:27 UTC