Fwd: [w3c/wcag] Reflow Understanding text hard to parse when it talks about 1.4.4 (#658)

Did we really want this language in the Understanding.
Don't we want 400% text size? 200% for me is a bad upper bound. I cannot
see it.
Lot's of us cannot see that.

Best, Wayne


---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: David MacDonald <notifications@github.com>
Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:29 AM
Subject: [w3c/wcag] Reflow Understanding text hard to parse when it talks
about 1.4.4 (#658)
To: w3c/wcag <wcag@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>


I find this sentence hard to parse

... For example, if text is set at 20px when the window is 1280px wide, at
200% zoom it should be at least 20px (so 200% of the default size), but at
400% zoom it could be set to 10px (therefore still 200% of the default 100%
view).

What is the 100% default view size, 5px? I've looked at this sentence for 5
minutes and still can't figure out what it is saying.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/658>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH0OF6E_Ofk3W1IGV60UXgwDUJRkmyW7ks5vV6uqgaJpZM4bq5pj>
.