Re: Brief summary of text resizing and reflow success criteria

look right to me

On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:14 AM Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the input in e-mail and on the call today.
>
> Are these correct -- even if not comprehensive:
>
> * When users resize text up to 400% or change text spacing, no information
> is lost.
> * In small windows ("viewports") or when users zoom text larger, text
> reflows so that users don't have to scroll to read a line of text.
>
> ?
>
> ~Shawn
>
>
>
> On 4/10/2019 2:41 PM, Jonathan Avila wrote:
> > Hi Wayne and Shawn, If this is for 2.1 then reflow would definitely fit
> into this as well.  The primary purpose of SC 1.4.10 is not for mobile but
> for low vision users to be able to zoom in to 400% from a standard
> resolution and still have a page that is readable without scrolling.    So
> in other words – to facilitate reflow of text at smaller viewports
> including those made smaller by using browser zoom.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > Jonathan Avila
> >
> > Chief Accessibility Officer
> >
> > *Level Access*
> >
> > jon.avila@levelaccess.com <mailto:jon.avila@levelaccess.com>
> >
> > 703.637.8957 office
> >
> > Visit us online: Website <http://www.levelaccess.com/> | Twitter <
> https://twitter.com/LevelAccessA11y> | Facebook <
> https://www.facebook.com/LevelAccessA11y/> | LinkedIn <
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/level-access> | Blog <
> http://www.levelaccess.com/blog/>
> >
> > The State of Digital Accessibility 2019 report is here! Download the
> report today to read the findings. Level Access <
> https://levelaccess.com/state-of-digital-accessibility-2019>
> >
> > The information contained in this transmission may be attorney
> privileged and/or confidential information intended for the use of the
> individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
> >
> > *From:*Wayne Dick [mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com]
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 10, 2019 3:35 PM
> > *To:* Shawn Henry
> > *Cc:* public-low-vision-a11y-tf
> > *Subject:* Re: Brief summary of text resizing and reflow success criteria
> >
> > *CAUTION:*This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
> >
> > Dear Shawn
> >
> > Is this for 2.0. It seems to miss the reflow criterion. Reflow is not
> for spacing.
> >
> > I think the 200% should apply to any browser that provides zoom.
> >
> > Best, Wayne
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 1:37 PM Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org <mailto:
> shawn@w3.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     Dear LVTF folks,
> >
> >     The Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) page "Accessibility
> Principles" briefly introduces the concepts behind accessibility and WAI's
> standards. It includes a section on "Content can be presented in different
> ways" and "Content is easier to see and hear".
> >
> >     I welcome your input on these two points in the draft update:
> >     * Text is resizable up to 200% without losing information, using a
> standard browser;
> >     * Text spacing can be adjusted without losing information, and
> reflows on small screens;
> >
> >     To see it in context:
> >
> https://deploy-preview-6--wai-accessibility-principles.netlify.com/fundamentals/accessibility-principles/#distinguishable
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     ~Shawn
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     <http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/>
> >
>
>

-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964