Re: Missing resources section in Non-text Contrast understanding doc & missing Non-text Contrast user need in requirements doc

Thanks Laura,

I've added those links, and an example for infographics. You can see the changes in the pull request:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag21/pull/776/files 

Not sure when it goes into the public version yet.

I linked to the user-requirements doc without a particular anchor, I think it would be useful to include 'non-text contrast' under the brightness/colours section. It doesn't need much content, just to state that where graphics are used they should have good contrast...

Cheers,

-Alastair


On 22/02/2018, 15:46, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi Alastair, Jim, and all,
    
    I noticed that the standard "Resources" section is missing from the
    Non-text Contrast Understanding document [1].
    
    So I started looking around for links that could be added to populate
    that section. We may want to list the email  from:
    
    * Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute -  "If the text is better
    understood with the graphics , they should be equally visible as the
    text." [2]
    *  Gordon Legge - "Contrast requirements for form controls should be
    equivalent to contrast requirements for text" [3]
    
    In addition, it seems that all of our other understanding docs list
    our "Accessibility Requirements for People with Low Vision" [4] as the
    first link in the "Resources" section. However, it appears that our
    requirements doc [4] doesn't have a specific user need for non-text
    contrast. Should we consider adding it?
    
    Thanks.
    
    Kindest Regards,
    Laura
    
    [1] https://rawgit.com/w3c/wcag21/non-text-contrast/understanding/21/non-text-contrast.html

    [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2017May/0007.html

    [3] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2017Jun/0054.html

    [4] https://www.w3.org/TR/low-vision-needs/

    
    -- 
    Laura L. Carlson

Received on Friday, 23 February 2018 17:21:06 UTC