- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 08:35:04 -0600
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Wayne, Great to hear from you! I agree with the 2 article approach. In the second article besides a high level overview of LV SC that Glenda mentioned, you could also point out what what failed to get into 2.1 (color, font, 4.5:1 for graphics, title attribute issues, etc) and still need. We miss you, Wayne. Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/19/17, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote: > Wayne, > > I think that is a great idea (to do two articles). > > 1. Accessibility Requirements > 2. Dec Release (high level overview of LV SC) > > We are currently targeting Dec 5th for the next working draft. I'm > optimistic we will have a working draft published around that date...we > have to...to stay on schedule. But be prepared for it to slip a day or two > (or three....) > > G > > > > glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 > *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals > > [image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: > Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)] > <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> > > > > > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > >> When is the December release scheduled? I am thinking I could do two >> articles: One on the Accessibility Requirements doc and how this >> motivated >> change. The next on the actual Dec Release as it pertains to LV. >> >> What do you think? >> >> This does has to be stated in very non-technical ways. Remember Jon, >> Steve, Scott, Eric, Shawn, Marlam, John and I are very atypical. Most >> will >> be ordinary users with no knowledge of accessibility technicalities. >> >> Thanks for your thoughts Glenda. >> >> Wayne >> >> >> >> Wayne >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hey Wayne, >>> >>> I've been doing something similar...and I'm in a quandry. Do I wait for >>> the December public working draft...or do I base my article/blog post on >>> the September draft. >>> >>> If you stay high level...you can use the September draft. But if you >>> start talking about SC by name...I think it would be best to wait for >>> the >>> Dec draft. I think we are shooting for Dec 5. >>> >>> See updated timeline here https://www.w3.org/WAI/G >>> L/wiki/WCAG_2.1_timeline >>> >>> G >>> >>> P.S. I'd be happy to be a casual reviewer of your article...if you >>> would >>> find that useful :) >>> >>> glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 >>> <(512)%20963-3773> >>> *web for everyone. web on everything.* - w3 goals >>> >>> [image: IAAP International Association of Accessibility Professionals: >>> Certified Professional in Accessibility Core Competencies (CPACC)] >>> <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Everyone, >>>> Thank you for your great work. >>>> >>>> The Council of Citizens with Low Vision has asked me to write a >>>> description of the WCAG 2.1 as it relates to low vision for their >>>> December >>>> Newsletter. I was thinking of basing it on the September 17 Working >>>> Draft >>>> since that is the only existing consensus document. I am aware of the >>>> consolidation changes that will occur. >>>> >>>> Most of my audience will not be able to read the document with any deep >>>> understanding. I will have to describe the practical impact. >>>> >>>> I'm thinking of 500 words. >>>> >>>> Do you have any guidance. >>>> >>>> Wayne >>>> >>> >>> >> > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 20 November 2017 14:35:28 UTC