Re: Popup SC need comments

​
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
 wrote:

> Hi Jim, Stephen, and all,
>
> With this rendition do we need definitions for "visible" and "invisible"?
>
> At one point we used the word "obscure". UAAG's definition is:
>
> "To render a visual element in the same screen space as a second
> visual element in a way that prevents the second visual element from
> being visually perceived."
> https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG20/#def-obscure


I like obscure. After fiddling/editing a bit, seems "obscure" works only
for TRIGGER. Only edit Trigger bullet.  I looked in WCAG20, where 'visible'
is used 5 times. It is never defined. Don't think we need to define it.

edited version
*Popup Interference:* Except where popup presentation is controlled by the
user agent, all of the following are true when popup content is visible:

·       *Trigger*: Popup content does not obscure any part of its
triggering content.

·       *Hover:* If a popup is triggered via pointer hover, then the
pointer may be moved onto the popup content without loss of visibility.

·       *Focus:* Popup content remains visible while any of its components,
including the trigger, have focus.

Where we define popup as " becomes visible only on pointer hover or focus”.

ORIGINAL

*Popup Interference:* Except where popup presentation is controlled by the
user agent, all of the following are true when popup content is visible:

·       *Trigger*: Popup content does not render any part of its triggering
content invisible.

·       *Hover:* If a popup is triggered via pointer hover, then the
pointer may be moved onto the popup content without loss of visibility.

·       *Focus:* Popup content remains visible while any of its components,
including the trigger, have focus.

Where we define popup as " becomes visible only on pointer hover or focus”.

​​
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jim, Stephen, and all,
>
> With this rendition do we need definitions for "visible" and "invisible"?
>
> At one point we used the word "obscure". UAAG's definition is:
>
> "To render a visual element in the same screen space as a second
> visual element in a way that prevents the second visual element from
> being visually perceived."
> https://www.w3.org/TR/UAAG20/#def-obscure
>
> It would be nice to get the readability level down a bit more but we
> could work on that later.
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Laura
>
>
> On 7/25/17, Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote:
> > All,
> > Steve, Laura, and others have been working on this SC. Below is the
> result.
> > If we could have comments soon. I would like to see if we can get this on
> > the queue for the Thursday AG meeting.
> >
> > *Popup Interference:* Except where popup presentation is controlled by
> the
> > user agent, all of the following are true when popup content is visible:
> >
> > ·       *Trigger*: Popup content does not render any part of its
> triggering
> > content invisible.
> >
> > ·       *Hover:* If a popup is triggered via pointer hover, then the
> > pointer may be moved onto the popup content without loss of visibility.
> >
> > ·       *Focus:* Popup content remains visible while any of its
> components,
> > including the trigger, have focus.
> >
> > Where we define popup as " becomes visible only on pointer hover or
> focus”.
> >
> > What does everyone think?  Any inaccessible gaps?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
> > Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
> > 1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
> > voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
> > "We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964
> >
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>



-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964