- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:12:55 +0000
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Thanks for that Shawn, lots of quality organisations there!
I think we need to be clear what we’re aiming for, to stretch a metaphor: a large hammer will break things, a couple of small hammers might have enough power.
If the SC text applies to whole pages (including navigation, menus, etc.) then it could create a high bar for conformance without (I think?) helping the end-users much.
My assumption is that blocks of text are the most relevant for readability, things like menus & buttons tend to have space around them anyway?
I think the two options are:
1. Use moderate values in the SC that apply to the whole page, and assume that people who need more also ‘linearize’, at which point menus etc. have their layout over-ridden anyway.
2. Use maximum (useful) values but narrow the scope to blocks of text.
So question to the group: Would you prefer this SC apply to the whole page a bit, or blocks of text a lot?
Or have I misunderstood the requirement?
Cheers,
-Alastair
On 26/01/2017, 17:50, "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
In followup to today's call, I added more research and guidelines at:
https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/References#Leading
Thanks!
~Shawn
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 09:13:30 UTC