- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:12:55 +0000
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Thanks for that Shawn, lots of quality organisations there! I think we need to be clear what we’re aiming for, to stretch a metaphor: a large hammer will break things, a couple of small hammers might have enough power. If the SC text applies to whole pages (including navigation, menus, etc.) then it could create a high bar for conformance without (I think?) helping the end-users much. My assumption is that blocks of text are the most relevant for readability, things like menus & buttons tend to have space around them anyway? I think the two options are: 1. Use moderate values in the SC that apply to the whole page, and assume that people who need more also ‘linearize’, at which point menus etc. have their layout over-ridden anyway. 2. Use maximum (useful) values but narrow the scope to blocks of text. So question to the group: Would you prefer this SC apply to the whole page a bit, or blocks of text a lot? Or have I misunderstood the requirement? Cheers, -Alastair On 26/01/2017, 17:50, "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org> wrote: In followup to today's call, I added more research and guidelines at: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/References#Leading Thanks! ~Shawn
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 09:13:30 UTC