Agenda

​
I think Alastair's Adaptive should be first on the agenda.

1.      Adaptation that works under the author-controlled styling/scripting
in a default browser, such as Resize content.
2.      Adapta
​​
tion that subtly over-rides author styles, such as text-color.
3.      Adaptation that will likely break layouts, such as linearisation,
spacing, font-family. Also several from COGA that I’ve seen, such as adding
icons to the text.
​4​
.      Personalisation where the website provides options for the user, or
in some way works with the user’s settings.

​We need to look at Text-Color, Resize Content, Linearize, Spacing, and
Font Family. The discussion has unveiled some confusion in how our
proposals are going to be interpreted.

How do we make it clear that a mechanism exists does not mean that the
author needs to program​ an accommodation?


How do we address the claim that if we cannot come up with an HTMLi failure
then we don't need an SC.

For me, element level adaptation seems more like a necessity.

Finally, for many on WCAG WG there is a serious hostility to requesting
visual adaptations. It is like they look for any excuse to deny them.

Can we discuss this, and come up with consistent language?

Wayne