Re: First draft of "Contrast (Minimum)" Proposed SC

Hi Wayne,

Agreed. We just need to figure out if it is a better fit under 1.4.3. or
2.4.7.

Kindest regards,
Laura
I am fairly adamant about including focus indicator. I spend lots of lost
time looking for the focused item when I'm tabbing. Sometimes, I use NVDA
just to know where I am.

Wayne

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have completed a first draft [1] of "Contrast (Minimum)" for our
> LVTF proposed success criteria.
>
> Jon, I added form field borders and a question regarding if the focus
> indicator contrast belongs in 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) [2] or if it is
> better suited in 2.4.7 Focus Visible [3].
>
> I prefaced items where I had a particular question with ???. I used @@
> to enclose  wording changes to the existing the SC as suggested in the
> Checklist for proposals for new Success Criteria [4].
>
> If anyone has ideas for improvement please let me know or feel free to
> edit the page at will.
>
> Josh, this new proposed SC is in support of LVTF SC GitHub Issue 3 [5]
> and my WCAG WG GitHub Issue 96 [6] assignment.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kindest Regards,
>
> Laura
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Contrast_%
> 28Minimum%29
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#visual-audio-contrast-contrast
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/#navigation-mechanisms-focus-visible
> [4]
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/WCAG_2.1_Success_Criteria#
> Checklist_for_proposals_for_new_Success_Criteria_or_to_
> change_existing_Success_Criteria
> [5] https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues/3
> [6] https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/96
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>