Re: lvtf-ACTION-78: User settings research...

Hi Jon,

I was only trying to summarize the most relevant research.
I could add the following:

These studies demonstrate the overall variability of contrast need. Some
have high contrast threshold regardless of font size. Others have
sensitivity to brightness or polarity and need less contrast or reverse
polarity. While all people with low vision have an elevated lower threshold
for contrast, the manner for meeting that need requires individual
accommodation.

Wayne

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>
wrote:

> Wayne,
>
> I agree that contrast needs to go up with smaller size text.  But from
> personal experience I also know that no matter how large certain text is
> the contrast will make it unreadable.  I’ve heard people in the field say
> it would be ok to allow lesser such as 1.5 contrast text if the text was 36
> points or something like that.  I disagree, it’s not some linear form as
> you say and at some point the ability to see and distinguish the text goes
> out for many people even if it’s a foot high.  That is – my guess is that
> it is some sort of curve that falls off near the lower levels of contrast.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
> *From:* Wayne Dick [mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 05, 2016 2:57 PM
> *To:* Low Vision Accessibility Task Force
> *Subject:* Re: lvtf-ACTION-78: User settings research...
>
>
>
> Survey of Contrast Research
>
> Arditi and Faye [2004] performed the latest research on the decreasing
> relationship between font size and the level of contrast. Rubin and Legge
> (1989) demonstrated the need for a higher contrast threshold for people
> with low vision (reduced visual acuity). The discussion of contrast in
> Understanding SC. 1.4.3 is extremely good, except that the relationship is
> not as linear as implied by the presentation. Still Ariditi and Faye
> established that as size goes up the contrast threshold goes down. The
> reference to font-size guidelines from the American Printing House for the
> Blind were developed in a context of print material.  It is less relevant
> in an era of digital documents. Arditi,
> Arditi, A. and Faye, E. (2004). Monocular and binocular letter contrast
> sensitivity and letter acuity in a diverse ophthalmologic practice.
> Supplement to Optometry and Vision Science, 81 (12S), 287.
>
> Rubin GS1, Legge GE., Psychophysics of reading. VI--The role of contrast
> in low vision.,  Vision Research, 1989; 29(1):79-91.
>
> APH Guidelines for Print Document Design, http://www.aph.org/research/
> design-guidelines/
>
> Note: Do we need more surveys?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Low Vision Accessibility Task Force Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
> lvtf-ACTION-78: User settings research...
>
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/track/actions/78
>
> Assigned to: Wayne Dick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>