- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:04:08 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair and all, On 10/20/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >> I meant copying the "Overlapping Tooltip Text on Hover" section (text >> and images) [1] into the description section of the Resize content >> Document > > Ah, thanks. You're welcome, Alastair :-) > I don’t see tooltips as something that fits with any of the resizing > criteria [2], as the author does not have control over the size or location of > tooltips. I think that gets back to what we discussed previously regarding that authors can control whether or not they put important information in title attributes that are unreadable when content and cursors are enlarged. > As discussed, a 'don’t use tooltips' SC is possible, although tricky to > define without banning standard drop-down menus, but it is a better fit. Okay. How would you define "metadata" for a new SC: "Metadata in a webpage that is shown on mouse-over does not include information necessary to understanding the content or functionality." Once we have that definition I would be happy to create a new SC wiki page. But let's not retire the "Seeing all elements" SC [1], which we have already submitted to WCAG WG and which does cover the "Cursor Overlapping Tooltip Text on Hover" issue until we have a new more focused SC proposal and the LVTF agrees to put it forward to the WCAG WG. Thank you. Kindest Regards, Laura [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Seeing_All_Interface_Elements [2] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Size_of_all_elements -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2016 17:04:38 UTC