W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > October 2016

Re: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 07:08:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvdE5vYagd1iNzPqyCr3cYx1wdsyXQea5SJ1xDLjr8z7sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Low Vision Task Force <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Erich,

I feel 4.5:1 is sufficient too but am open to other view points. :-)

Kindest Regards,
Laura

On 10/19/16, Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I feel 4.5:1 is sufficient
>
>                     Erich Manser
>
>                     IBM
>
>                     Accessibility,
>
>                     IBM Research
>
>                     Littleton,
>
>                     MA / tel:
>
>                     978-696-1810
>
>                     Search for
>
>                     accessibility
>
>                     answers
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> You don't need eyesight to have vision.
>
>
>
> From:	Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
> To:	Erich Manser/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc:	Low Vision Task Force <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
> Date:	10/19/2016 07:17 AM
> Subject:	Re: Informational Graphic Contrast (Minimum)
>
>
>
> Hi Erich and all,
>
> 4.5:1 is what this group agreed to put forth to the WCAG WG for TPAC.
> But we have not discussed it since their comments.
>
> Do you think it should be increased?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kindest regards,
> Laura
>
> On 10/18/16, Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>> 4.5:1 has been deemed acceptable in our reviews, am I correct in that?
>>
>>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Informational_Graphic_Contrast_%28Minimum%29
>
>>
>>
>>
>>                     Erich Manser
>>
>>                     IBM
>>
>>                     Accessibility,
>>
>>                     IBM Research
>>
>>                     Littleton,
>>
>>                     MA / tel:
>>
>>                     978-696-1810
>>
>>                     Search for
>>
>>                     accessibility
>>
>>                     answers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> You don't need eyesight to have vision.
>>
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>
>
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 12:09:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 27 April 2017 14:44:31 UTC