- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:25:25 +0000
- To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Laura, That example wouldn’t be covered by either of the proposed “metadata on hover” wordings because it is not triggered by hover. (It was triggered by deleting email, onclick on or keypress.) It also isn’t “informational content” because it has links, and isn’t meta-data… so it really isn’t covered here! Also, if something is already covered by an SC, I thought we would try and avoid overlap? It is clearly covered by the Resize content one. Also, I’m still not clear how the ‘fully visible’ definition would cover the mouse cursor aspect? As there is no author controlled way to affect the mouse cursor (except hiding it!), we really have to go with “not conveying information” that way. Cheers, -Alastair On 18/11/2016, 16:13, "Laura Carlson" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Alastair, That's where the "not clipped or truncated" part of the "fully visible" definition may be able to help if we go the route. Thanks. Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/18/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: >> Question for #4: To address Wayne's use case where the popup covers >> content in gmail and won't go away > > I think that fails 1.4.4 Resize text now, and if it doesn’t then it will > fail Resize content. > > It is not triggered by hover, it was based on a user-action, it is just that > the dismiss button is hidden due to the resizing. > > I think we can remove that as an example from this one, but it could be > added to resize content. > > -Alastair > > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 16:26:00 UTC