- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:20:51 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Avila <jon.avila@ssbbartgroup.com>, "public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org" <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, Ah. Another approach. We'll get there yet one way or another :-) Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/18/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Jonathan wrote: >> I'd imagine people would ask about fly out menus, modal dialogs, roll >> overs, etc > and >> I'm concerned about the text "does not obscure other content" because any >> hamburger menu or dialog will obscure other content. > > That’s why it had “informational content”, to distinguish from functional / > navigational items. > > It also included “only appears on-hover”, so anything that can be focused > with the keyboard is not covered, but it would be good to incorporate your > improvement to “onhover”. > > Katie wrote: >> Well I *think* SC have to be phrased to define success. So even though >> that language might cover the issue, I do not we should phrase it that >> way. > > That sounds familiar, but what about this current one? 1.4.1 “Color is not > used as the only visual means of conveying information…” > > Tweaking it a bit: > “Informational content that is only shown by hovering your mouse over an > element is not used as the only means of conveying information and does not > obscure other content.” > > I’m tweaking this version because I’m struggling to see how we define “fully > visible” in the other version. Also, unless we add that it must also work > with an increased cursor size any current tooltip would pass. > > The other version also doesn’t cover the obscuring other information > aspect. > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 15:21:24 UTC