W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

Re: Metadata On Hover SC Text

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:13:56 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOavpvdLtk=TZu9HNWQHxHsyZ-iYy+nkg2yntNiyg-8N=-qHcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Marla and all,

In today's meeting you said, "Is there a way to build in to this that
the content has to remain open for some time?"

I added a bit to the "Fully visible" definition to try to address that point:

"Fully visible: content within the viewport that is not covered,
obscured, clipped, or truncated and remains in the viewport as long as
the user needs it. "

Will that work?  Ideas for improvement? I wonder if that may cover
Wayne's example of the popup that won't go away too.

Thanks,
Laura

On 11/17/16, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The latest is at:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_On_Hover
>
> Alastair, any thoughts on verbiage to update the testablity section?
>
> All ideas for improvement most welcome.
>
> Kindest regards,
> Laura
>
> On 11/17/16, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Done. Thanks Katie.
>>
>> On 11/17/16, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Laura,
>>>
>>> I think that makes way too much sense.......:-)
>>>
>>> My vote, do it!
>>>
>>> ​​​​​
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> * katie *
>>>
>>> Katie Haritos-Shea
>>> Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
>>>
>>> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile |
>>> Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 2:53 PM
>>> To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; public-low-vision-a11y-tf
>>> <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Metadata On Hover SC Text
>>>
>>> Hi Katie and all,
>>>
>>> I added "covered" to the obscured bullet point. Thank you. I started a
>>> working definition for "fully visible". So far it is: "content within
>>> the
>>> viewport that is not clipped or truncated." Does that work?
>>>
>>> I wonder to simplify the SC, if we if we could add the "not covered or
>>> obscured" bit to the "fully visible" definition? If so, then we drop the
>>> second bullet all together.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks again.
>>>
>>> Kindest Regards,
>>> Laura
>>>
>>> On 11/17/16, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Laura,
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like you had a good call....
>>>>
>>>> I think we do need to define 'Fully Visible'.
>>>>
>>>> Also how about adding covered to the obscured line?
>>>>
>>>> Informational content which appears on hover that is necessary for
>>>> understanding must be:
>>>> *  fully visible,
>>>> *  not covered or obscured,
>>>> *  available on focus as well as hover, and
>>>> *  available via any input method.
>>>>
>>>> ​​​​​
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * katie *
>>>>
>>>> Katie Haritos-Shea
>>>> Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
>>>>
>>>> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile
>>>> |
>>>> Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Laura L. Carlson
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Laura L. Carlson
>>
>
>
> --
> Laura L. Carlson
>


-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 21:14:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:23:23 UTC