- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:56:13 -0600
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "Rochford, John" <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
Hi Katie, I like it. Thank you! Is there anyone who can't live with Katie's version? Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/17/16, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > Laura, > > I see your point. What about this language? > > Content that is necessary for understanding which appears on hover, must > be: > * discernible, > * not obscured by other content, and > * available via any input method > > > > > > * katie * > > Katie Haritos-Shea > Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) > > Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | > Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 10:10 AM > To: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> > Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>; Alastair > Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Rochford, John > <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>; Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Metadata On Hover SC Text > > Hi Katie, > > Thanks. We can certainly can do that. Any thoughts on the following combined > text? > > Content that is necessary for understanding and appears on hover: > * is discernible, > * does not obscure other content, and > * is available by any input method. > > Maybe that is too much for one SC? If so, I can separate Into two SCs. > > Kindest Regards, > Laura > > On 11/17/16, Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: >> Laura, >> >> It should probably be two is my thought >> >> >> >> >> >> * katie * >> >> Katie Haritos-Shea >> Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) >> >> Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile >> | >> Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:13 AM >> To: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>; >> Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Rochford, John >> <john.rochford@umassmed.edu>; Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> >> Subject: Metadata On Hover SC Text >> >> Hi John, Alistair, Wayne, and all, >> >> I am trying to understand the proposed change to the Metadata On Hover >> [1] SC text. During the October 27th meeting it was changed to: >> "Content that appears on hover should not obscure the triggering >> element or other content." After that Wayne asked me to add his "Popup >> Text Overwriting Actionable Buttons Example" screenshot, which I did. >> >> With these 2 changes it seems that the original issue may have gotten >> lost. >> The original issue was not content obscuring the triggering element or >> other content. It was the "Cursor Overlapping Tooltip Text on Hover" >> due to authors using title attributes. Simply put: Authors shouldn't >> not rely on tool tips alone. Authors should not put important >> information in title attributes that can become unreadable when content >> and cursors are enlarged. >> Information should be available through more than one mechanism. >> >> I think either Alistair's or my prior versions of the SC text address >> that original problem. That SC text was: >> >> 1. "Hidden content that is necessary for understanding is available >> using any available input method." - Alistair, 25 October 2016 2. >> "Metadata in a webpage that is shown on mouse-over does not include >> information necessary to perceive content." - Laura, 21 October 2016 >> >> But now that we have 2 different hover issues 1) Cursor Overlapping >> Tooltip Text on Hover as well as 2) Popup Text Overwriting Actionable >> Buttons in this one SC, how do we best address both issues? Ideas for new >> SC verbiage? >> >> Or should they be 2 different SCs? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thank you. >> >> Kindest Regards, >> Laura >> [1] >> https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Metadata_on_Mouse-Ov >> er >> >> -- >> Laura L. Carlson >> >> >> > > > -- > Laura L. Carlson > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 15:56:45 UTC